Subclinical Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage (HMOD) in Hypertension: Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) and Calcium Score.

Calcium controls numerous events within the vessel wall. Permeability of the endothelium is calcium dependent, as are platelet activation and adhesion, vascular smooth muscle proliferation and migration, and synthesis of fibrous connective tissue. Double-helix computerized tomography is a noninvasive technique that can detect, measure, and compare coronary calcification in the coronary arteries. Despite some convincing evidence about the prognostic value and usefulness of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in the stratification of cardiovascular risk in the high risk general population and also in hypertensive patients, current guidelines for the management of hypertension, do not include such evaluation among the recommended procedures to be performed in the majority of patients even with the intent to detect hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) in an early phase. On the contrary, the European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes, the 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, and the 2018 Cholesterol Clinical Practice Guidelines indicate that the evaluation of CACS may be of some usefulness in specific subpopulations, although this view is not accepted in the US Preventive Services Task Force document. Very recently, the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice stated that CACS estimation may be considered to improve risk classification around treatment decision thresholds. In conclusion, the use of CACS as a diagnostic tool is still controversial. While some evidence exists about is ability to improve stratification of cardiovascular risk in primary prevention, in particular in selected patients who are at intermediate or borderline risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, there is insufficient evidence to use it as a standard means to assess HMOD.

Comparison of the characteristics, morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 between first and second/third wave in a hospital setting in Lombardy: a retrospective cohort study.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represents a major health problem in terms of deaths and long-term sequelae. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Montichiari Hospital (Brescia, Italy) to better understand the determinants of outcome in two different COVID-19 outbreaks. A total of 634 unvaccinated patients admitted from local emergency room to the Internal Medicine ward with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and a moderate-to-severe COVID-19 were included in the study. A group of 260 consecutive patients during SARS-CoV-2 first wave (from February to May 2020) and 374 consecutive patients during SARS-CoV-2 2nd/3rd wave (from October 2020 to May 2021) were considered. Demographic data were not significantly different between waves, except a lower prevalence of female sex during first wave. Mortality was significantly higher during the 1st wave than in the following periods (24.2% vs. 11%; p < 0.001). Time from symptoms onset to hospital admission was longer during first wave (8 ± 6 vs. 6 ± 4 days; p < 0.001), while in-hospital staying was significantly shorter (10 ± 14 vs. 15 ± 11 days; p < 0.001). Other significant differences were a larger use of corticosteroids and low-molecular weight heparin as well less antibiotic prescription during the second wave. Respiratory, bio-humoral and X-ray scores were significantly poorer at the time of admission in first-wave patients. After a multivariate regression analysis, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin values, % fraction of inspired oxygen on admission to the Internal Medicine ward and length of hospital stay and duration of symptoms were the strongest predictors of outcome. Concomitant anti-hypertensive treatment (including ACE-inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers) did not affect the outcome. In conclusion, our data suggest that earlier diagnosis, timely hospital admission and rational use of the therapeutic options reduced the systemic inflammatory response and were associated to a better outcome during the 2nd/3rd wave.